AI-Powered ATS: 50% reduction in time-to-hire
Built a modular, AI-augmented Applicant Tracking System with parsing, ranking, funnel analytics, and evaluation harness to turn hiring into a predictable machine.
Technology Stack
Key Outcomes
- •50% reduction in time-to-hire (resume claim)
- •Improved candidate NPS via transparent, faster stages
- •Live funnel analytics for recruiters and leadership
Context
Noble House needed hiring to move at the speed of business. Legacy tools created latency and blind spots across sourcing, screening, and scheduling. We set a singular KPI: cut time-to-hire by half while increasing candidate satisfaction. (Metric sourced from my resume.)
Problem
- Recruiters were juggling multiple systems; data-entry and follow-ups slowed offers.
- Screening lacked consistent, fair scoring; interviews clashed; funnel drop-off was invisible.
Constraints
- Integrate with existing job boards/HRIS.
- Preserve auditability and reduce bias; support remote-first teams.
My role & team
I served as CTO and architect, leading cross-functional squads (product, data, platform, QA). I defined the KPI model, architecture, and an evaluation harness for ranking quality.
Approach
- Discovery & KPI model — mapped current funnel and baseline SLAs.
- Data pipeline — resume ingestion and canonical candidate profile.
- Ranking & rules — skill signals, recency, constraints; human-oversight loops.
- Scheduling & comms — automated calendars, SMS/email nudges.
- Funnel analytics — time-in-stage, drop-off, and alerting.
- Evals & guardrails — weekly tests for precision/cost/latency; bias checks.
Architecture (at a glance)
Ingestion (parsers/webhooks) → Profile Store (PostgreSQL) → Ranker API (Python) → Orchestrator (.NET) → UI (React) → BI (funnel dashboards) → Notification service (email/SMS).
What we built
- Resume parsing + profile unification with manual overrides.
- Ranking service combining rules + learned signals; HITL review queues.
- One-click scheduling with calendar sync and candidate preferences.
- Funnel dashboards with SLA alerts; offer workflow with approvals.
Results
- 50% ↓ time-to-hire and faster recruiter response times.
- Higher candidate satisfaction; fewer drop-offs at screening/interview.
- Reliable reporting for leadership and clients.
Lessons
- Data hygiene beats model cleverness.
- Guardrails + evaluation harness keep models honest as volume grows.
Next
- Integrate structured interview rubrics; expand fairness audits; add sourcing marketplace.
CTA
Want a deep dive into the evaluation harness or ranking rules? Book a 30-min call.
Source for headline metric and ATS ownership: